Staff Blogs

Posts tagged media

Adding Twitter’s @anywhere to your siteApril 15, 2010 by Mark Rochefort

  1. Create a new app at dev.twitter.com/anywhere/apps/new
    a) Application Name = Name of your website
    b) Application Website = Your website URL
    c) Callback URL = Your website URL
  2. Insert the following code into your html:
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
     <script src="http://platform.twitter.com/anywhere.js?id=YOUR_APP_ID&v=1"></script>
      <script type="text/javascript">
          twttr.anywhere(onAnywhereLoad);
          function onAnywhereLoad(twitter) {
            twitter.hovercards();
            twitter('.follow-me').followButton("yourtwittername");

          };

      </script>
  3. Job done. Grab a coffee and read more on the API docs

Demo:
* hover card – @markrocky || @markrocky
* follow button –

No Tags

Read more

Click through rate on UK banner advertising amongst lowest in EuropeJune 30, 2009 by Mike Teasdale

This month DoubleClick published a useful benchmark of online advertising performance rates across all activity in 2008.  This is pretty much the most solid data you'll ever see on display advertising performance, based according to DoubleClick on: "hundreds of advertisers, thousands of campaigns, and tens of billions of ad impressions."

It's a useful set of benchmarks showing for instance variations in click rates by size and format of ads.  The data is also split by geography - which shows some fairly disappointing results for the UK.

The table below shows the average click through rate across all formats (static image, flash, video) for the main economies in Europe, plus the United States.  (The DoubleClick report has worldwide performance data for twenty nine countries).

Country Overall Click-through Rate  
Spain 0.14%
Germany 0.13%
France 0.12%
Italy 0.12%
United States 0.10%
United Kingdom 0.08%


This is really disappointing - and not just for the online advertising industry.  As the Guardian recently pointed out, the British newspaper industry is also desperately hoping for a renaissance from online advertising.

So why the poor performance.  Probably no single reason, but possible reasons would be:

  • banner fatigue - advertising creative not being refreshed often enough
  • lower percentage of inventory going on larger sizes / more static formats
  • larger percentage of media going out across networks which tend to deliver a lower CPC
  • more brand advertising versus direct response campaigns

Any more ideas anyone?

Read more

Google Street View introduces virtual tourismJanuary 20, 2009 by Mike Teasdale

There were plenty of reports of Google's Street View spy cars being spotted around the UK last year, so presumably we won't have too long to wait for Street View being introduced here.  


Meanwhile Street View is live in Paris, and it is now surprisingly high-definition.  I can imagine a new vogue for virtual tourism where you can travel to exotic locations and take screen grabs rather than photos.

For instance, here's my "photo" of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris - frankly pretty much on a par with some of my real photography.

Google Street View - Notre Dame

Zooming into the courtyard in front of the cathedral is a nice little vignette - what looks to me to be a gipsy presenting an unwitting tourist with some 'free' lucky heather.

Google Street View - Notre Dame zoom

And on full zoom, I think you could pretty much identify the people involved.  There's going to be so much fun along these lines when the UK versions launch!

Google Street View - Notre Dame zoom

Read more

Fifty years of marketing in three minutesJanuary 20, 2009 by Mike Teasdale

This lovely little animation from German agency Sholz and Friends compresses fifty years of marketing into a three minute film.  Don't be put off by the slightly intimidating title: "Dramatic Shift in Marketing Reality".



Read more

Please consider the environment before searching on GoogleJanuary 12, 2009 by Mike Teasdale

The BBC reports today on the environmental cost of a single Google search.  According to a Harvard University academic, each two searches on Google have the same carbon footprint as boiling a kettle.  So each day, Google is wrecking the environment to the tune of 200 million searches, or 100 million cups of tea.


Google may not be the worst offender.  A report on Trendsspotting last October compared the carbon footprint of Facebook with that of major US cities.  Based on the remarkable statistic that there are now 10 billion photos hosted on Facebook, Trendsspotting calculated that the carbon footprint of Facebook was around half that of New York City - and Facebook is piling on more servers all the time to keep up with user demand.
Facebook carbon footprint

Right now, we're all so obsessed with the credit crunch, but it can't be long before environmental issues come to the forefront once more.  And perhaps digital can't maintain it's smug "we're paper-free, so we don't contribute to global warming" stance for too much longer.

Looking further ahead, maybe we will see steam-powered server farms in Iceland and have websites showing a "Hosted on recycled energy" badge.  

Read more

The imminent death of local mediaDecember 16, 2008 by Mike Teasdale

Last Friday I went to a Westminster Media Forum event on the Future of Local Media. Claire Enders, the founder of media research company Enders Analysis, kicked things off with a thoroughly depressing analysis of the state of local media and here are my notes from her session.  (The Press Gazette also covered this talk under the headline: Urgent action needed to save newspapers)

Local radio

Local commercial radio has an unequal fight against BBC local radio: commercial radio spends £170 million per year on programming against the BBC's budget for local radio of £400 million.
  
In audience terms, there has been a steady drift from local radio to national radio, especially towards BBC Radio's 2 and 4.  

Advertising revenues peaked in 2003/04 and have been steadily declining since then.

In general there is an over-supply of commercial impacts - advertising volumes are exceeding demand, which obviously implies falling rates.

Claire predicts that local commercial radio will be pretty much extinct within the next five to ten years.

Local newspapers

The sector is declining, and the rate of decline is accelerating.  Income for local newspapers is heavily reliant on advertising which has been decimated in waves - first job ads, then property (and now retail).

BMRB figures show the time being spent with newspapers is declining even faster than newspaper's reach - especially amongst young people and most strongly amongst 20 to 24-year-olds.  So even where people are still buying a Sunday newspaper for example, they are allocating less time in their day to reading it.

What's left is a hard-core of elderly local newspaper readers who are also 'Internet rejectors' - households which are not online and which see no point in going online.  

The result is that ten to fifteen local newspapers are closing each week.  And Claire predicts that half of all jobs in local newspapers will be gone in five years.

Advertising market

Also looking forward five years, the Advertising Association predicts that 34% of advertising spend will go online by 2013.
  
But that does not mean that online is the answer for local media.  The value of a regular reader of a local newspaper, including direct and advertising revenues, is estimated at £91 per year.  But a regular visitor to a local newspaper website is generating just £3 per year.

So where are the advertising revenues going?  Some will have followed classified advertising online to sites like Monster, Autotrader, Gumtree and eBay.  But the biggest share is going to our old friend Google.  On Google, Claire made the interesting point that an algorithmic approach to content leads inevitably to monopoly, whilst a people-based approach encourages diversity.   

Whilst Google is in many ways a blessing, it cannot be said to have delivered much value in terms of employment.  According to Claire, on UK revenues of £1.2 billion, Google employs 10,000 people whereas the UK press, with total revenues of £2.4 billion employs a total of 175,000 people.  (Actually I'd be amazed if Google employs anything like 10,000 people in the UK - there may be 10,000 staff across the UK offices and the European headquarters in Dublin.)  

Can anything be done?

Claire Enders argues for a rapid removal of controls on the local media market, including cross-channel ownership restrictions which prevent the same company owning local newspapers and local radio stations.  

Meanwhile newspapers are too reliant on Google for traffic to negotiate fair commercial terms for the content that Google indexes - so perhaps there is a role for government here, via a Google windfall tax, to redress the balance.

As for local radio, it seems unfair to blame the BBC for the poor performance of their commercial rivals.  After all, very recently local radio stations were profitable - but the profits have not generally been re-invested in quality local programming.

One of the biggest problems with local media in general is not just that market dynamics have changed, but that they are changing incredibly fast.  If we aren't careful, the diversity of local media will be destroyed before politicians and the general public really realise what is going on.  By then writing a letter to the local newspaper or mouthing off on the local radio phone in will no longer be options.  And advertisers will have lost an incredibly powerful way to connect to a local audience.

Read more

The return of the platform game: From Jet Set Willy to LittleBigPlanetDecember 2, 2008 by Mark Rochefort

I’m not much of a “gamer”, although I have to admit I am able to reference my life by what computer game I was playing since I was about 10 years old (for the record - Jet Set Willy, on the trusty ZX Spectrum) - maybe before then, if you include the clunky Radio Shack games I played on my Dad’s computers.

Jet Set Willy (1984: ZX Spectrum), Sonic the Hedgehog (1991: Sega Megadrive), Monkey Island (1990: PC), Doom (1993: PC), Worms (1995: PC), Abe’s Oddysee (1997: PS1), Grand Theft Auto (1997: PC), Rainbow Six (1998: PC) and many more; they all chart a certain personal view of the evolution of console and computer gaming. And it’s incredible to think how things have changed.

I can mark eras of my life in the same way you might signpost your autobiographical memory with where you were living. Sad but true. It tends to be just the one game as I don’t devote masses of time to gaming - when I find a game that I like, I stick with it.

Recently, I persuaded my wife that a PS3 would be a great addition to our family because “a PS3 is so much more than just a games console - you can use it to view all those digital photos and videos of our son”. And I’m glad I did as I think I’ve found the game to mark the next era - LittleBigPlanet. This game is incredible. It has brought the traditional platform game into the future with a fun, creative and collaborative online world that is constantly changing and ever evolving. Irrespective of what it represents in terms of incredible media and technological innovation, it also represents a return to pure and simple platform based game-play, with a few twists. And, possibly most importantly, it is impossible not to feel happy playing this game. It looks like we’re going to have some fun with this one…


LittleBigPlanet - UK Launch Trailer from Media Molecule on Vimeo.

, , , , , , , , ,

Read more

Open source: utopian-dreams, recession-proofing and socialism…August 19, 2008 by Mark Rochefort

Those who know me will undoubtedly have at some point had the pleasure of listening to me ranting on about the power of the open source movement - or, more generally, social collaboration online. On the bus yesterday I read an editorial piece - “Collaboration is the new revolution” - in the Guardian newspaper that certainly struck a few chords. Here’s a few extracts, by way of a summary:

1) Open source paves the way for the odd utopian dream:

Sir Thomas More’s description of Utopia as a place where “nobody owns anything, but everyone is rich” is not a bad way to describe the open source movement in which people around the world collaborate with each other to produce services that anyone can use - or improve on - for nothing.

2) Open source is recession proof:

One of the interesting things about the collaborative movement is that it is probably recession-proof, though you won’t see it in economic statistics because it mostly does not involve cash transactions.

3) Open source is robust and well-trusted by large successful organisations:

Big corporations, such as IBM, Google and Amazon, are devourers of open source software because they find it cheap, efficient, low-maintenance and reliable. But UK government departments, including health and the foreign office, have proved risk-averse with hardly any open source in their infrastructure.

4) Open source is socialism (well, social collaboration at least):

…open source combines the cooperative spirit that was at the heart of the Labour party in the past with the entrepreneurial skills needed today.

And with nothing more to add to that summary, I’m off to join the revolution (well, okay, I’m off down the pub to carry on ranting to anyone who’s too polite to stop me).

, ,

Read more

Open source: utopian-dreams, recession-proofing and socialism…August 19, 2008 by Mark Rochefort

Those who know me will undoubtedly have at some point had the pleasure of listening to me ranting on about the power of the open source movement – or, more generally, social collaboration online. On the bus yesterday I read an editorial piece – “Collaboration is the new revolution” – in the Guardian newspaper that certainly struck a few chords. Here’s a few extracts, by way of a summary:

1) Open source paves the way for the odd utopian dream:

Sir Thomas More’s description of Utopia as a place where “nobody owns anything, but everyone is rich” is not a bad way to describe the open source movement in which people around the world collaborate with each other to produce services that anyone can use – or improve on – for nothing.

2) Open source is recession proof:

One of the interesting things about the collaborative movement is that it is probably recession-proof, though you won’t see it in economic statistics because it mostly does not involve cash transactions.

3) Open source is robust and well-trusted by large successful organisations:

Big corporations, such as IBM, Google and Amazon, are devourers of open source software because they find it cheap, efficient, low-maintenance and reliable. But UK government departments, including health and the foreign office, have proved risk-averse with hardly any open source in their infrastructure.

4) Open source is socialism (well, social collaboration at least):

…open source combines the cooperative spirit that was at the heart of the Labour party in the past with the entrepreneurial skills needed today.

And with nothing more to add to that summary, I’m off to join the revolution (well, okay, I’m off down the pub to carry on ranting to anyone who’s too polite to stop me).

, ,

Read more

Open source: utopian-dreams, recession-proofing and socialism…August 19, 2008 by Mark Rochefort

Those who know me will undoubtedly have at some point had the pleasure of listening to me ranting on about the power of the open source movement - or, more generally, social collaboration online. On the bus yesterday I read an editorial piece - “Collaboration is the new revolution” - in the Guardian newspaper that certainly struck a few chords. Here’s a few extracts, by way of a summary:

1) Open source paves the way for the odd utopian dream:

Sir Thomas More’s description of Utopia as a place where “nobody owns anything, but everyone is rich” is not a bad way to describe the open source movement in which people around the world collaborate with each other to produce services that anyone can use - or improve on - for nothing.

2) Open source is recession proof:

One of the interesting things about the collaborative movement is that it is probably recession-proof, though you won’t see it in economic statistics because it mostly does not involve cash transactions.

3) Open source is robust and well-trusted by large successful organisations:

Big corporations, such as IBM, Google and Amazon, are devourers of open source software because they find it cheap, efficient, low-maintenance and reliable. But UK government departments, including health and the foreign office, have proved risk-averse with hardly any open source in their infrastructure.

4) Open source is socialism (well, social collaboration at least):

…open source combines the cooperative spirit that was at the heart of the Labour party in the past with the entrepreneurial skills needed today.

And with nothing more to add to that summary, I’m off to join the revolution (well, okay, I’m off down the pub to carry on ranting to anyone who’s too polite to stop me).

, ,

Read more
1 2 3 4 5 > »