Thanks to the wonderful Valerie Casey of the Designers Accord for showcasing this fab infographic at her SXSW keynote.  The graphic featured in the New York Times earlier this month.

I'm sure the truth is a little more complicated, but all the same this graphic really makes a powerful case...

Thanks to the wonderful Valerie Casey of the Designers Accord for showcasing this wonderful infographic at her SXSW keynote.  The graphic featured in the New York Times earlier this month.

I'm sure the truth is a little more complicated, but all the same this graphic really makes a powerful case...

I'm now back from my trip to Austin and pleased to say that the panel session went just great!  Big thanks of course to my co-panelist Rand Schulman and our moderator Joanna Burton.

I want to blog about it in a bit more detail, but for now I thought I'd just collect together the online resources that support the panel.  It's pretty amazing just how much content has been generated around a single panel - perhaps an indication of how interesting people found the subject.

So, vaguely in date order we have:

 

1) Original proposal on SXSW Panelpicker

This is the original idea for a panel which was commented and voted on.  Looking back, the list of questions answered looks fascinating (What are agencies for?, What kind of marketing do customers really want?...).  Shame we didn't really get to all of these in the final panel.

 

2) Slide deck on Slideshare

The proposal then got kicked around into this final presentation - the session itself was formal presentation followed by Q&A.

 

3) Twitter comments on #toomuchmath

Every panel at SXSW had a pre-set Twitter hashtag, although some panels (including some keynotes) didn't do a great job of publicising the tags before the session. Luckily I caught a session with Cliff Atkinson reading from his book The Backchannel: How Audiences are Using Twitter and Social Media earlier in the week, so borrowed the idea from him of putting our hashtag and Twitter name on every slide. 

I'm sure that this helped generate a ton of comments on Twitter - mostly favourable, although being English I have fixated on the negative ones :-)

It also definitely helped that we had a nice short hashtag.  This wasn't an accident - Rand's PR agency Launchsquad liaised with SXSW to get this sorted out, so good attention to detail Emilie Cole!

Apparently searches on Google for 'toomuchmath' during the panel were bringing up live results off Twitter - hats off to Google for this, as the tag wasn't showing any traffic before 9.30am on Tuesday.  I guess that's what realtime search is all about :-)

 

4) Live blog

Daniel Slaughter did a pretty amazing job of writing his notes up into a live blog.  My takeout from this is that if I used more slides with really simple bullets on them and maybe talked a bit slower, people might do better at taking notes.  Oh well...

 

5) Lunch.com reviews / ratings

Lunch.com launched a community feature at SXSW - and to show how it worked, they put together a SXSW Community where every panel (and party!) could be reviewed and rated.  I think this is a great idea - and in our case it generated a fantastically detailed review by Derek Overbey which I really appreciate.  We're currently rated at a +2.6, dragged down by a single negative vote from Robert Scoble - was he even at the panel?

 

6) Interview on WebProNews

Finally here's the unedited stream of a TV interview I did before the panel - where I'm talking off the cuff about some of the ideas we dealt with in our panel.

Will be interesting to see the edited version which I'm promised will be released soon.

 

Phew - so still to come is the podcast, possibly - I think that SXSW were recording the session.  Anything I've missed?

Here's a heat map of my week at SXSW based on Four Square data mapped to Where Do You Go.  The outliers on the map are mostly trips out to culturally significant TexMex restaurants like Guero's and Chuy's... some are a little mystifying (did I really make it up as far as 20th Street???)

eBay was donating $0.25 to charity for every FourSquare login during SXSW - I "raised" over $10 myself during the week, so this must have been a significant donation taken across all 14,000 attendees.

I’m now back from my trip to Austin and pleased to say that the panel session went just great!  Big thanks of course to my co-panelist Rand Schulman and our moderator Joanna Burton.

I want to blog about it in a bit more detail, but for now I thought I’d just collect together the online resources that support the panel.  It’s pretty amazing just how much content has been generated around a single panel – perhaps an indication of how interesting people found the subject.

So, vaguely in date order we have:

 

1) Original proposal on SXSW Panelpicker

This is the original idea for a panel which was commented and voted on.  Looking back, the list of questions answered looks fascinating (What are agencies for?, What kind of marketing do customers really want?…).  Shame we didn’t really get to all of these in the final panel.

 

2) Slide deck on Slideshare

The proposal then got kicked around into this final presentation – the session itself was formal presentation followed by Q&A.

 

3) Twitter comments on #toomuchmath

Every panel at SXSW had a pre-set Twitter hashtag, although some panels (including some keynotes) didn’t do a great job of publicising the tags before the session. Luckily I caught a session with Cliff Atkinson reading from his book The Backchannel: How Audiences are Using Twitter and Social Media earlier in the week, so borrowed the idea from him of putting our hashtag and Twitter name on every slide. 

I’m sure that this helped generate a ton of comments on Twitter – mostly favourable, although being English I have fixated on the negative ones :-)

It also definitely helped that we had a nice short hashtag.  This wasn’t an accident – Rand’s PR agency Launchsquad liaised with SXSW to get this sorted out, so good attention to detail Emilie Cole!

Apparently searches on Google for ‘toomuchmath’ during the panel were bringing up live results off Twitter – hats off to Google for this, as the tag wasn’t showing any traffic before 9.30am on Tuesday.  I guess that’s what realtime search is all about :-)

 

4) Live blog

Daniel Slaughter did a pretty amazing job of writing his notes up into a live blog.  My takeout from this is that if I used more slides with really simple bullets on them and maybe talked a bit slower, people might do better at taking notes.  Oh well…

 

5) Lunch.com reviews / ratings

Lunch.com launched a community feature at SXSW – and to show how it worked, they put together a SXSW Community where every panel (and party!) could be reviewed and rated.  I think this is a great idea – and in our case it generated a fantastically detailed review by Derek Overbey which I really appreciate.  We’re currently rated at a +2.6, dragged down by a single negative vote from Robert Scoble – was he even at the panel?

 

6) Interview on WebProNews

Finally here’s the unedited stream of a TV interview I did before the panel – where I’m talking off the cuff about some of the ideas we dealt with in our panel.

Will be interesting to see the edited version which I’m promised will be released soon.

 

Phew – so still to come is the podcast, possibly – I think that SXSW were recording the session.  Anything I’ve missed?

I’m now back from my trip to Austin and pleased to say that the panel session went just great!  Big thanks of course to my co-panelist Rand Schulman and our moderator Joanna Burton.

I want to blog about it in a bit more detail, but for now I thought I’d just collect together the online resources that support the panel.  It’s pretty amazing just how much content has been generated around a single panel – perhaps an indication of how interesting people found the subject.

So, vaguely in date order we have:

 

1) Original proposal on SXSW Panelpicker

This is the original idea for a panel which was commented and voted on.  Looking back, the list of questions answered looks fascinating (What are agencies for?, What kind of marketing do customers really want?…).  Shame we didn’t really get to all of these in the final panel.

 

2) Slide deck on Slideshare

The proposal then got kicked around into this final presentation – the session itself was formal presentation followed by Q&A.

 

3) Twitter comments on #toomuchmath

Every panel at SXSW had a pre-set Twitter hashtag, although some panels (including some keynotes) didn’t do a great job of publicising the tags before the session. Luckily I caught a session with Cliff Atkinson reading from his book The Backchannel: How Audiences are Using Twitter and Social Media earlier in the week, so borrowed the idea from him of putting our hashtag and Twitter name on every slide. 

I’m sure that this helped generate a ton of comments on Twitter – mostly favourable, although being English I have fixated on the negative ones :-)

It also definitely helped that we had a nice short hashtag.  This wasn’t an accident – Rand’s PR agency Launchsquad liaised with SXSW to get this sorted out, so good attention to detail Emilie!

Apparently searches on Google for ‘toomuchmath’ during the panel were bringing up live results off Twitter – hats off to Google for this, as the tag wasn’t showing any traffic before 9.30am on Tuesday.  I guess that’s what realtime search is all about :-)

 

4) Live blog

Daniel Slaughter did a pretty amazing job of writing his notes up into a live blog.  My takeout from this is that if I used more slides with really simple bullets on them and maybe talked a bit slower, people might do better at taking notes.  Oh well…

 

5) Lunch.com reviews / ratings

Lunch.com launched a community feature at SXSW – and to show how it worked, they put together a SXSW Community where every panel (and party!) could be reviewed and rated.  I think this is a great idea – and in our case it generated a fantastically detailed review by Derek Overbey which I really appreciate.  We’re currently rated at a +2.6, dragged down by a single negative vote from Robert Scoble – was he even at the panel?

 

6) Interview on WebProNews

Finally here’s the unedited stream of a TV interview I did before the panel – where I’m talking off the cuff about some of the ideas we dealt with in our panel.

Will be interesting to see the edited version which I’m promised will be released soon.

 

Phew – so still to come is the podcast, possibly – I think that SXSW were recording the session.  Anything I’ve missed?

I walked past this scene outside the Barclays Bank on Dean Street in Soho this afternoon - what on earth is this all about?  Have they spent their massive profits building a new private army?

That's the headline of a story in the Times this morning - which, as my colleague William has pointed out, is one of the all-time great headlines.

Yesterday I was talking at the IDM about email creative and as normal a question came up along the lines of "can I use FREE in an email subject line".

The answer is probably yes.  If you run FREE through SpamAssassin it does give you a negative score of 1.0, but that generally won't be enough to prevent your email from getting delivered - particularly if you have a generally good reputation score. 

Generally speaking we could be much much braver with headlines.  And to prove the point, I did a quick check on The Times' headline - and it too would have got through SpamAssassin pretty much unscathed.  Of course, had the journalist been more precise, using brand names of drugs and perhaps quoting prices, then we might have more of a mountain to climb.

Voting is in full swing for the panels at next year's SXSW in Austin Texas.  Earlier this year I was lucky enough to do a panel on doing business in Europe - next year I'd love to go back.

I have two sessions you can vote for.

1) Is too much math killing marketing

Breakthrough marketing used to come from creative genius, from big ideas, from empathy with customers. But now all the attention goes to rigorous testing and algorithmic approaches to customer insight. So is the science driving out creativity - or are we focused on the wrong kind of maths?

To vote for this one, go here.

2) How Social Media CRM Will Transform Marketing Communications

If email is dying, what does this mean for eCRM? Can Twitter, Facebook Messaging and Google Wave do the same heavy lifting as a good old-fashioned email newsletter? The new social media tools may be free - but are they as useful for businesses as the ones they replace?

To vote for this one, go here.

You don't have too long to vote - actually voting closes at midnight on Friday the 4th September.

If you're interested in the second topic, I'm doing a cut-down version of this at the IDM Academy at Ad:Tech in London.  And no doubt I can find some way to get the first topic out into the fresh air.

So thank you, thank you, thank you!!

Nice little stunt in the street outside Sony HQ in Great Marlborough Street - Watchdog has a van parked up full of engineers who are repairing PlayStations for free to bring attention to Sony's charging policy.

This kind of consumer direct action reminds me of a Milton Jones' joke - available I believe on a nice shiny DVD just in time for Christmas. 

"I went to our local train station and they told me 'There's a bus replacement service running today.'  So I gave them a tin of pineapple rings.  'What's this?'  'It's my money replacement service.'